SRA to Strip Away Solicitor Qualifications

The Solicitors Regulation Authority will unveil a new publication today which is thought to put in place a radical reform for the require qualifications to enter the legal profession in the UK.

The changes, which will be laid out within this publication, are said to offer future solicitors more alternative routes into the legal profession and also allow them to design their own routes into the profession; this will include stripping away many required qualifications.

The change, which is said to be laid out as a blueprint today, will lay out the plan to strip away the generic solicitors’ qualification but instead simply provide the essential ‘day one’ stills required; however, it will be up to the individual to choose how they will acquire these essential skills.

Although, the SRA are yet to formally announce whether this new blueprint will in-fact become reality as they are yet to make well educated decisions on the matter. Furthermore, the SRA have also said that they will review if the generic solicitors’ qualification is still appropriate as the original paper suggest that it may still be an essential element of the qualification process.

The SRA will publish a formal consultation on removing unnecessary regulations at some point over the next three months. However, for now at least, the question will remain whether this reform will be positive or negative for the legal profession.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk

Is Squatting Illegal in a Commercial Property?

In 2012 the British government introduced a controversial law to protect residential property owners. The new law, Section 144 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, criminalises the act of squatting in a residential building and holds a financial penalty of up to £5,000 and up to a year in prison. Beforehand, it was only considered a criminal offence if criminal damage was caused within the residential property by the squatter.

However, this newly introduced law does not protect commercial property’s. While it is still considered illegal to cause criminal damage within a commercial property; it is not an illegal offence to squat in a property being used for commercial reasons.

However, the British government are now under growing pressure to expand the new law to protect commercial property’s as well as residential property’s. The reason? Many local authorities have seen a decrease in the number of squatters within residential buildings; however, the new law has also caused a increase in the number squatters within commercial property’s. Calling into question the overall success of this new law.

For clarification: it is illegal to squat in a residential property (with or without causing criminal damage). However, it is legal to squat within a commercial property (unless criminal damage is caused). Although, the current squatters rights and property owners rights are still taken into consideration.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk 

SRA Introduces it’s New Chief Executive

Today, the Solicitors Regulation Authority named Paul Philip as its new Chef Executive, who will take the position early next year.

Paul Philip, who is currently the deputy chief executive of the General Medical Council will take his new position on the 1st January of next year. And while his current position has no connection to the legal sector Philip has held roles within the legal sector beforehand.

In the past Philip’s has held a senior position within the Legal Services Commission and the National Health Service; furthermore, he also holds a degree and masters in law and has also been called to the bar at Lincoln’s Inn.

But what does this mean for the legal sector and its solicitors?

At the moment it is not known what changes will be made by Philip’s. However, with the SRA and the legal sector being placed under further pressure than ever before it will certainly be a position of intense pressure. More information is certain to be announced in the coming months including the pay package of Philip’s and his personal ambitions at the SRA over the coming years.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk

 

Aston Bond Hosts TWIS: The Greatest Networking Event of The Year

This past week Aston Bond solicitors were honoured to host TWIS, a monthly business networking event bringing together businesses from close and far to share their business know-how and take advantage of each others skills. However, this month’s TWIS was very different to any other and has been described “the best networking event” and simple “hilarious”.

Not only were we surrounded by a great crowd of local business owners and employees but also had great entertainment in the form of Ali-G lookalike Danni B! Watch his interview with our TWIS panel and Aston Bond’s senior conveyancing solicitor Nick Powe.

 

 

For more pictures from the event please take a look at our Facebook page, and more videos can be found on our YouTube channel.

Your Rights, Responsibilities & The Law When Using Social Media

Social media is a great tool for both businesses and individuals, Aston Bond use Twitter and Facebook ourselves. However, since social media’s founding we have seen an increase in the number of cases where people have been prosecuted for their actions on social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. And more than often its because the individuals involved were not aware that any law protected users of social media and that they were in-fact legally binding statements.

Within this post I will explain your rights and responsibilities when using social media sites and how you can protect yourself from any legal difficulties.

Which Laws Protect Social Media Users? 

There is no specific law in the United Kingdom which refers to social media alone, however; social media is protected by a number of laws such as the Malicious Communications Act of 1988, the Communications Act of 2003 (section 127), and the Criminal Justice and Police Act of 2001 (section 43). These laws all cover social media and other forms of electrical methods of communication including email.

Under these laws it is illegal to send “indecent” or “grossly offensive” messages, and/or send “threats”, or “false information” with the intention of “causing distress or anxiety” to its receiver or receivers.

Furthermore, the Harassment Act of 1997 also plays a part in the protection of social media users and  if found guilty of sending such content by way of electrical communication (i.e. social media, email) you can face both a fine and up to a six month prison sentence.

What are Your Rights & How to Protect Yourself 

Social media is considered very similar to any other method of communication including telephone or text message and regulated under the same laws as email messaging. Its for this reason that your rights are fairly obvious. You have the right to feel safe and not threatened and you have the right of freedom of speech unless it may cause distress and/or anxiety to somebody who may view that message.

However, its much more complicated when trying to protect yourself. With so many social media websites around each has different methods of protecting its users. The most popular way to protect yourself is by paying attention to the privacy settings and also blocking users who you do not wish to be able to communicate with you. Furthermore, the majority of social media sites give its users the ability to report an individual of cyber bullying or threatening behaviour.

Furthermore, with the laws above protecting social media users, you also have the protection of both the police and UK legal system. Notifying, and providing the police with evidence to show that somebody has made you feel distressed and/or anxious on social media may be evidence enough to make a prosecution.

You should also take into consideration the law surround libel which also includes electrical communication such as social media.

What Should You Avoid Doing

Many social media users believe that the images, videos and text they publish on social media sites can be deleted and never viewed again. However, the majority of social networks including Facebook, Twitter and some email platforms store messages, images and videos after they have been deleted in order to protect other users when and if they report abuse. This content may and can be viewed during an investigation.

The best way to avoid getting in trouble with the law when using social media is to censor your status updates, tweets or images and videos shared. This will ensure that you are posting content which will not cause offence or harm.

Furthermore, you must also remember that it is not just the original content you publish but also your comments on others contents. Pages on Facebook have also been known to be the source of an arrest. For example, if you were to start a Facebook page which targets a specific group of people and its considered to be illegal then this may and likely will back fire on you at some point.

However, the best way to avoid any lawsuit from your use of social media is to limit the opinions you share on social media and never get involved bullying, celebrity or not. You should also think before you share, as once its shared its never completely deleted. Furthermore, with so many people using public social media sites such as Twitter and YouTube your content can now be viewed by millions in just a few hours.

A Conclusion 

A recent survey showed that over 30% of teenagers have been affected by cyber bullying in their life. And with the dramatic growth of new social media sites it’s a certainty that this number will increase. However, its becoming easier to protect yourself from cyber bullying as well as avoid being considered a cyber bully or offending individuals over social media.  Share safely . .

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive 

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk 

Top 3 TV Shows for Wannabe Lawyers

Suits, Law and Order UK, The Briefs

It’s hard to imagine what it would be like to have a professional career as a lawyer or what it is like to work in a legal environment. However, the subject of law within TV shows has seen a huge boost over the past two years with a number of huge TV networks launching shows based around the legal profession.

So, what better way to get a taste of the legal profession than from your living room couch? Today I have compiled the top 3 shows currently airing all about being a lawyer. Enjoy.

The Briefs

If you’re looking for a realistic look at the legal lifestyle then you will love The Briefs. The documentary show follows a well know English law firm as they go by their daily work. Ranging from criminal damage cases to a simple call to the court. The show gives a realistic and non-edited look at the life of a criminal defence lawyer. Originally aired on BBC and continuing repeats being shown The Briefs is a real look at the UK legal system and men and women behind it.

Suits

Suits has been a huge hit in America and its cult like following is spreading across the Atlantic with the show now being hugely successful here in the UK. The drama and comedy show follows a fictional law firm based in New York as a new guy works his way up in the industry without ease. The show ranges from jealous colleagues to general life issues but has a comedic feel along the way.

Law & Order UK

Originally a U.S TV show Law and Order soon made its way to British TV and is now on its seventh series. The dramatic show gives the views of the two sides of the legal sector, the Police who catch the criminal and the lawyers who try to prove them innocent.  The show follows through each investigation from the forensics to the final court case and has a truly captivating story along the way.

So, if you’re preparing to begin law school this September then these three shows may be worth watching. If you have any suggestions of your own then why not send us a tweet.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk

G20 Nations to Take on Global Tax Avoidance

The worlds G20 nations are expected to make an agreement today to fight against tax avoidance by multinationals. While much of the gathering will be taken up by topics including Syria and the US financial stimulus programme it is expected that the G20 nations will sign an agreement putting further focus on tax avoidance.

The focus of these discussions will be the use of legal methods to avoid tax being used by the world’s biggest companies including Starbucks and Amazon. In recent months it has been revealed that many international companies have been using a number of legal methods to avoid tax, it is these methods which the G20 nations aim to put pressure on.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk

The Ministry of Sound takes on Spotify with Copyright Lawsuit

It has been confirmed today that the UK based record label The Ministry of Sound has filed a lawsuit against online music streaming service Spotify for damages and the removal of playlists including its tracks.

This comes after the record label has repeatedly requested that Spotify, which was founded in Sweden in 2008, to remove playlist which included its tracks and thereby infringing copyright laws.

The record label claims that they had repeatedly requested that Spotify remove the playlists which featured songs using “Ministry of Sound” in their titles, however, Spotify did not comply with these request. Along with the request of these playlist being removed from the service The Ministry of Sound has also filled for damages and losses caused by the music streaming services refusal to remove the playlists.

But does Spotify have the responsibility to remove these playlist? In short, yes. Spotify are the only people able to remove playlist from its service, other than the individuals who created the original playlist. Furthermore, Spotify is a paid for service; this means that the users of this playlist may have been paying to listen to the music without the record label receiving any form of imbursement.

While Spotify did not speak regarding the lawsuit directly they did go onto say that over 1 billion playlist have been created by its users since its launch and that over 20 million tracks are available on its service. However, you could argue that this adds further fuel to the fire with this highlighting the financial gain being made from the music streaming service which currently has 24 million users; many of which pay a monthly subscription.

The outcome of the case is yet to be seen. However, the lawsuit is sure to go ahead with legal proceedings being launched this past Monday in the UK’s high court by The Ministry of Sound.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk

The Co-operative Introduce Online Solicitor Training Scheme

A new scheme set up by the Co-operative Legal Services and the Manchester Metropolitan University will allow future lawyers to learn the art of being a lawyer through an online teaching system it was recently announced.

The new scheme along with the current apprenticeship scheme and university postgraduate programme will enable trainee solicitors to progress faster in their chosen area of law while still learning the skills needed to flourish in their career as a legal professional.

The new scheme will also use existing qualifications from CILEx and the Chartered Insurance Institute which will all work towards allowing trainee solicitors to further progress in their career as a legal professional.

However, this news is overshadowed by the recent news of a £3.4 million loss in the first half of this year for the Co-operative. The future of this scheme is unknown with it still being in its infancy; however, it does highlight a change in how people enter the legal sector.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk

Legal Services Consumer Panel Call for Single Regulator

As the Ministry of Justice conduct an in-depth review of the current regulations of the legal system the Legal Services Consumer Panel have called for a single independent regulator to be set up for the entire legal sector.

This comes as the MOJ review the current legal system across the UK with the aim to simplify the current legal services regulations. However, the dramatic response from the Legal Services Consumer Panel highlights how consumers view the current regulatory system surrounding the UK legal sector.

The chair of the panel, Elisabeth Davis, went on to say that the current system isn’t delivering the outcomes consumers need, offering instead a confusing maze where consumers can find themselves in a dead end due to the gaps in redress and regulations.

Furthermore, the panel went on to say that regulators and ombudsman are unsure of which area they currently regulate.

Since this response the MOJ are under further pressure to scrap the current regulatory system. However, as the market becomes increasingly competitive many believe that scrapping the current system at this point may put consumers at further risk. However, if a new system is introduced it will see dramatic changes including the possible closure of regulatory bodies including the SRA and LSB. However, it may be seen as the best and only long-term option available in order stream line the system making it easier for consumers to make the right choices and in turn reducing the cost of legal services.

Ashton Hudson, Online Marketing Executive

ahudson@astonbond.co.uk