Employment Law in 2017

Employment Law in 2017 – Important Changes

2017 is expected to bring about a few important changes to employment law.

The most anticipated will be the Supreme Court’s decision on Brexit which is due soon. Whilst no immediate employment law changes will happen on the back of this, there will undoubtedly be much speculation as to how Brexit will affect employment law generally in the future.

Similarly, the 2016 Budget and thereafter the Autumn statement both confirmed that changes would be introduced to the tax treatment of termination payments.  The government are consulting on the draft bill now with the changes expected to be implemented at a later date, namely in April 2018.

More immediate changes for employment law in 2017 expected are:

  • The current weekly rate of statutory maternity/paternity/adoption/shared parental leave pay (which is currently £139.58, or 90% of the employee’s average weekly earnings if this figure is less than the statutory rate) is being increased to £140.98. This will take affect from 2nd April 2017.
  • The minimum wage for workers over 25 will increase to £7.50 in April, an increase of 30p on the rate introduced last year. There will be smaller increases for 18-20 and 21-24 year olds, to £5.60 and £7.05 respectively.
  • From 6th April, statutory sick pay (SSP) is also increasing from £88.45 to £89.35. This is, as usual, subject to minimum eligibility requirements.
  • Gender pay gap reporting. Employers with 250 or more employees will be required to produce gender pay gap reports by April 2018 for the financial period 2016/2017.
  • Large employers (with an annual payroll of more than £3 million) will be required to pay a 0.5% levy on their total pay bill, by 6th April 2017. Larger employers will then be able to access the fund (plus a 10% top-up from the government) to fund accredited apprenticeships within their business. Different rules will apply to smaller employers who are not required to pay the levy – in which case the government will fund the cost of apprenticeships if they contribute 10%.
  • Salary-sacrifice schemes will start to be phased out with no new schemes to be introduced from April 2017 and the ones set up prior to this date will be protected until anywhere between 2018-2021 depending on the type of scheme in place.

– Ilinca Mardarescu

For any advice on implementing the changes or any other employment-law related enquiry, contact us here or call us on 01753 486 777.

The Autumn Statement: Employment Affects

How will the Autumn Statement affect Employment?

Salary Sacrifice schemes

There were a number of employment related implications in this year’s Autumn Statement. The most controversial of these was perhaps the removal of tax-free incentives on “salary sacrifice” schemes. The schemes allowed employees to “buy” a certain number of employment perks by agreeing to a cut in their wages in return for certain benefits. The schemes would often be used to provide tax-free benefits such as medical insurance, free gym membership, health checks and mobile phone contracts.

The advantage to employees was that any tax and NI would be calculated on their lower, agreed wage discounting the “sacrifice” they have made in lieu of these perks. This could mean substantial savings and even meant some employees who would have been classed as higher earners could sacrifice enough of their wages for these perks thereby taking them into the lower tax bracket. For employers too, the salary sacrifice schemes meant they would benefit by being able to discount the portion of the salary which had been sacrificed when calculating national insurance payments. The more employees a company had, the more beneficial the scheme was and substantial NI savings could be made by larger companies offering a salary sacrifice scheme.

These schemes were never formally part of any Government policy however. The method grew organically some years ago and HMRC allowed the practice to continue unhindered. Recently, the Treasury has looked at the practice and has concluded that it is losing out on tax revenue as a result. The changes to the salary sacrifice scheme have been expected.  However, keeping in line with policy, enhanced employer pension contributions (to registered pension schemes), childcare benefits, cycles and the cycle to work scheme and ultra-low emission cars will be exempt from these new changes.

National and Living wage

Increases were announced, effective from April 2017, as follows:

The National Living Wage for those aged 25 and over will increase from £7.20 per hour to £7.50 per hour.

The National Minimum Wage will also increase:

  • for 21 to 24 year olds – from £6.95 per hour to £7.05
  • for 18 to 20 year olds – from £5.55 per hour to £5.60
  • for 16 to 17 year olds – from £4.00 per hour to £4.05
  • for apprentices – from £3.40 per hour to £3.50

And the Chancellor confirmed that he will spend £4.3 million on helping small businesses to understand the rules and on cracking down on employers who are breaking the law by not paying the minimum wage.

Raising the tax-free personal allowance

The Chancellor confirmed that the tax-free personal allowance will be raised to £11,500 in April 2017.  He further confirmed that ‘despite challenging fiscal forecasts” they will continue to raise the personal tax-free allowance to £12,500 by the end of the parliament.

The Chancellor also confirmed that the point at which the higher rate of income tax will kick in will increase from £43,000 this year, to £45,000 in 2017-18

Employee Shareholder Status

‘Employee shareholder’ status (ESS) was introduced in September 2013 as a new category of worker status. Employee shareholders could forgo a number of employment protections, such as the right to a redundancy payment and protection from unfair dismissal, in return for a minimum of £2,000 of shares in the employer’s business. There were various tax benefits to these schemes and employers used them to reward those in management or other employees who have contributed to the growth of a business. These schemes will now be abolished in situations where parties enter into the agreements on or after 1 December 2016. For ESS arrangements entered into before 1 December 2016, the tax advantages will continue to apply. The removal of this benefit is largely in response to evidence that ESS was being used for tax planning.

Termination Payments

The Autumn Statement has confirmed that the first £30,000 of a termination payment will remain exempt from income tax and National Insurance. However, from April 2018 termination payments over £30,000, which are subject to income tax, will also be subject to employer NIC. Following a technical consultation, tax will only be applied to the equivalent of an employee’s basic pay if their notice is not worked, making it simpler to apply the new rules. This means that certain post-employment and/or bonus payments will not be classed as earnings. However, the government has said it will monitor this change and address any further manipulation.

Leave a comment below…

Victory for Uber Drivers

It’s likely that most of us would have heard about Uber having lost the case brought by a number of their drivers. The Employment Tribunal has handed down its decision in the case of Aslam and ors v Uber BV that the drivers are not self-employed contractors as Uber claimed but are instead workers (as per the Employment Rights Act 1996). Importantly, they are not employees. And there is a big difference between the two, especially when it comes to Uber employment rights.

Workers are entitled to certain protections such as paid annual leave, protection regarding working time and rest breaks, whistle-blowing protection and the right to be paid the national minimum (and living) wage. For Uber drivers this will be a great victory. However, as they are not employees they will not be able to claim unfair dismissal, redundancy payments, sick pay or holiday pay, pension contributions, rights under TUPE should UBER sell its business or even the basic principles of the implied terms of trust and confidence. This of course raises the possibility that at a later date, Uber could make all its drivers redundant and change the business model again to one in which their status may again be called into question.

The Tribunal criticised the lengths Uber went to in order to be able to argue its drivers were self-employed (such as constructing the requirement for drivers to provide invoices – but which in fact Uber created itself, and the notion in their own T&C’s that the drivers enter into individual contracts with each passenger – which the Tribunal pointed out was ludicrous bearing in mid the parties do not know each other and the fact payment is set by and goes to Uber).

Of course, the decision will be challenged by Uber – they have already confirmed they are preparing the appeal. It would not be a surprise if the matter ultimately went as far as the Supreme Court. However, for now, any Uber drivers with a claim should issue proceedings as soon as possible so as to preserve their position with regards to limitation and then should apply to have the matter “stayed” until the appeals are all heard.

As the “gig economy” grows, it is highly likely that this case will open the floodgate for others currently classed as self-employed such as Hermes, other courier drivers and the likes of Deliveroo.

Leave a comment below…

Employment Law & Brexit- What would it mean?

Of course it’s extremely difficult for anyone to speculate on the consequences of Brexit, seeing as it is a unique position we find ourselves in, and there are much more qualified and appropriate people who can do this better than I.  However, speculate we must if we are to make an informed decision on 23rd June 2016.

Those advocating a Brexit would argue that employment law amongst most others is heavily influenced by the EU.  And this is of course correct. They would cite that EU laws are intrusive and the “red tape” that businesses have to deal with stifle enterprise. But I am not convinced this is so.  If we did leave the EU, would the government really repeal all the employment protections that we are now accustomed to?

If the Brexit campaign win on 23rd June there will be a period of two years (minimum) in which we will prepare for the exit – it will not be an automatic closing of our doors. This period will inevitably be a somewhat unstable time for the country going through a period of great change. The government will not want to do anything to “rock the boat”.  Creating stability will be their main concern.

Furthermore, although numerous laws are indeed based on the EU directives, each country then implements domestic legislation which gives effect to the EU directives.  And in many cases, the UK government have chosen to not only implement the EU directives but to extend them.  For instance, the EU has stipulated that employees should be allowed a minimum of 20 days annual leave per year – but the UK government have extended this to 28 days in the UK. Similarly, with maternity leave or the right to request flexible working, the UK exceeds the minimum requirements set down by the EU.

It is also unlikely any of the discrimination legislation would be repealed. Firstly because the majority of people would now agree that doing so would be taking a real step backwards, but also relevant is the fact that the UK implemented various discrimination laws well before the EU ever did.

How about the family friendly employment laws we enjoy in the UK? The recent shared parental leave and pay legislation is purely a UK one – nothing to do with the EU. And as detailed above, we have gone so far as to extend the legislation in some areas more than in the EU.  It is highly unlikely anything substantial will change in this arena either then.

There will of course be some amendments.  It is anticipated that one of those that will be the first to fall by the wayside is the CRD IV which limits bankers variable pay (bonuses) throughout Europe. Our government may well decide that the one thing our economy will need is to be able to stay as competitive as possible. It is also likely that the agency workers regulations (which a stipulates that any agency workers who have been in the same position for 12 weeks or more should be treated equally to the equivalent full time employees) will be scrapped. Some of the record keeping requirements in the Working Time Directive are likely to be scrapped as would the need to follow the recent decisions regarding holiday pay being able to be carried over when an employee is off on long-term sick or including commission calculations into holiday pay for employee who work in sale-based roles.

The above would hardly be ground-breaking amendments in the grand scheme of things, but will matter a great deal to many individuals.  However, the biggest impact will ultimately be the question of immigration, or free movement of workers.  If, as many commentators believe, we adopt a Norway-style model, it is unlikely we will in fact be able to restrict this free movement of workers.

Whatever the decision, the employment landscape will certainly shift. But whether it is by as much as people believe it will…we will have to wait and see.

Follow Ilinca on her LinkedIn

Leave a comment below…

Unlimited Holiday – Not Just a Dream

There is a new innovative policy that simultaneously increases productivity and employee loyalty. A policy adopted by Silicon Valley tech companies, Virgin and now East Anglian law firms. The policy is ‘unlimited holiday’. It scraps annual leave allowances and lets employees take as much holiday as they need/want. It requires notice to be given before holidays are taken but encourages employees not to take time off when it would be detrimental to the overall running of the company. Continue reading “Unlimited Holiday – Not Just a Dream”

Spending Review – What you Need to Know

Osborne’s first Autumn Spending Review under a completely Conservative government took place yesterday.  Rafts of measures were introduced with some surprising results. The total government spending is set to rise from £756 billion this year to £821 billion in 2020. While at the same time, government spending as a percentage of output will fall from 40% (2010) to 36.5% in 2020. In the next five years the government will borrow £8 billion less than originally predicted in July. George Osbourne put this down to better tax receipts and lower interest payments on debt. Many supporters of the spending review highlight this as the ‘end of austerity’. Continue reading “Spending Review – What you Need to Know”

What Contributory Pension Regulations mean for Employers/Employees.

The 2015 Budget laid out significant changes to UK workplace pensions. The new contributory pension regulations require (over the next few years) employers to provide a workplace pension scheme to all their employees (who meet the criteria). There has also been the introduction of the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST) which is centred upon ‘auto-enrolment’. Continue reading “What Contributory Pension Regulations mean for Employers/Employees.”